Brian Jordan Alvarez

Elliott Norris
I see pics of them together from like...8 months ago. Nothing indicating it was romantic, but Elliott doesn't strike me as BJA's type. He's got a VERY specific type, and Elliott definitely doesn't hit that chord. Who can say though? Anything is possible.
 
oh the film crew will be forever damaged, needing tons of therapy because they unknowingly were present when a man's mouth swallowed another man's dick for a brief minute underneath a sheet.

They need protection. Let's start a thread for their victimization concerns.
My dude your takes in this thread are consistently baffling
 
  • Like
Reactions: capt1989
I think the topic has slightly gone off topic. So bringing it back to BJA fanship.

I watched the English Teacher again with a friend, we both were just amazed how good it is -So gay, so funny in regards to teachers, so adult -and it got made and celebrated on mainstream TV and is getting so many nominations. Can't say I have seem much like it on a basic cable channel (FX). Streaming only is where shows like Queer as Folk and Uncoupled usually fall, where the gay men are permitted to be sexual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ofnelxo
Here's the tee, and I'm a cuntmonster for saying it but facts are facts...

Whether you think he's talented or not (I personally think he is, in a quirky kind of way) he really wants to be a mainstream Hollywood star. He signed with CAA, the MAJOR talent agency in Hollywood, and when he did that he took down his two indie movies he made that had more explicit content. He edited things like the hard-on in the shower footage people have posted here out of the movies, and made the edited/censored versions available on Amazon.

He actually played the supporting/guest role of Jack's boyfriend Estefan on the last two seasons of Will & Grace (he was AWFUL) and now he's campaigning for an Emmy award (no chance in Hell of even a nomination.)

But despite the fact that his agents and reps have CLEARLY told him to cut down the X-rated content, he still posts these underwear and short-shorts dancing videos. Why? Because he's broke. Last month he had to beg on Twitter to come up with the funds to pay his rent. And I don't begrudge him that but the underwear-dancing is clearly bait to get people to give him money.

So it seems like he's conflicted in his desire to be sexually open and post explicit sexual content, and to be a mainstream successful actor. I personally thought "Caleb" and his other movie "Grandmother's Gold" (no sexual content whatsoever) were GREAT. But I don't think he's destined to be a major Hollywood success, because he's handsome and quirky but I don't think he's got the chops of a mega-talent.

Of course people have done far more with far less, so who knows? Rumor has it he still does in-person sex work on the side in DTLA to pay the bills, so with quarantine he probably lost that income which is why he had to beg for his rent to be paid.

Anyway, I do think he's hot as fuck. Kind of wish he'd do an OnlyFans TBH. I'd pay for straight up sexual content, but I refuse to throw money at him for teasing people in his tighty whities. But if other people want to, fuck, they should do what they want!

BTW if you want to find the uncensored original versions of his two movies with sexual content, they're on the gay torrent sites.
maybe he's just doesn't hate sex or is shamed by it.
 
i hope Ebeling is charged with making a false police report, and the LA prosecutor seeks the most aggressive carceral sentence in line with the typcial sentence for the crime he falsified. If you get two years in jail for sexual assault, you get two years in jail for falsely accusing someone of sexual assault.

then, i hope BJA sues Ebeling for millions for libel & defamation. Ebeling said he was raped, and, unless he is a transgender, that’s objectively a lie in California.

my final hope is gay rights organizations support BJA’s legal defense and campaign against this horrific hate crime against the gay community that uses the nonsense trope that homosexual men are really sexual predators of men who fuck women. men who fuck women are the oppressor class for gay men, the class who commits all gay bashing, the class who hate us for existing as homosexual. heterosupremacy is not ok, certainly not in California.
 
i hope Ebeling is charged with making a false police report, and the LA prosecutor seeks the most aggressive carceral sentence in line with the typcial sentence for the crime he falsified. If you get two years in jail for sexual assault, you get two years in jail for falsely accusing someone of sexual assault.

then, i hope BJA sues Ebeling for millions for libel & defamation. Ebeling said he was raped, and, unless he is a transgender, that’s objectively a lie in California.
I am SO disappointed to tell you this, but the rules that exist in your head about what isn't sexual assault aren't real. California penal code defines forcible oral copulation as sexual assault, and it's not defined as gender or sexuality specific.

Jon never said he was penetrated, the only time the word rape was used when he texted Stephanie immediately after Brian forced oral on him during filming. He filed a report for sexual assault, not rape. All of his public allegations have been about forced oral sex, and intimidation.

And again QUOTE from Brian's LAWYER

”He does not dispute the act but argues that because their previous sexual encounters were consensual, Alvarez assumed the same would be the case here.”

There is no false accusation. Brian admitted the act happened, via his lawyer. For both instances.
 
Whether Jon consented the first time or not is up to the Los Angeles legal system, but the second time he never said yes.
As as we all know, one of the primary reasons sexual assault and rape are rarely reported and even more rarely prosecuted is because it is nearly impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so victims - if they can get past the shame of the act and the fear of stigmitization - don't feel like it's worth the trouble to pursue charges. Satistically it is estimated about 30% of sexual assaults are reported, and of those, only 5-10% get prosecuted. In total less than 1% of *REPORTED* sexual assaults lead to a conviction.

Facing those odds, it is no wonder so few victims come forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockoncoxon
males can’t be raped in California. it’s the law. Ebeling said BJA raped him, an impossibility. That’s libel. Rape doesn’t mean sexual assault in the way murder does not mean kill. Rape is a special crime where the victim must be female and be vaginaly penetrated with a penis because biology means this is a far different and worse crime than other unwanted sexual activity. As ABC News now knows, don’t say rape when no rape occurred or be prepared to pay up.

sexual activity without a yes is no crime. only unwanted sexual activity after a clear no is potentially a crime. legal illiterates shouldn’t speak about the law.

sexual assault requires a clear no and it must be forcible. a straight dude who is bigger and stronger than the gay guy must convinvingly explain why he did not resist. most reasonable people will conclude the available exculpatory evidence, a prior sexual relationship & the sexual nature of the film & the discussions before filmimg & the liar’s statements afterwards & failure to resist, points clearly to consent.

at worst case, the liar could make a civil workplace sexual harrassment claim to advance his raging homophobic idea of the straight male as victim of a gay male sexual predator. good luck with convincing any sentitient person he’s not lying based upon the timing of the suit for a payout from a new hollywood star.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colorfulkent
Big guy lawyer here sure knows the law. I can look up the california penal code just like anyone else. If anyone is the legal illiterate here it's you.
the sine qua non to be a rape is that with which you and all men who fuck women have so much experience with - pussy. keep at it with this libel and you’ll be sued as well.
 
a man who fucks women appropriating the culture of Black women to advance his hateful attack on a gay man in defense of an obviously mendacious straight man on nothing more than his word, while endangering gay lives perpetuating the trope of the homosexual as sexual predator of his oppressor class.